21-06-2013, 12:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-06-2013, 04:37 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Aggressive damage control. CNN is doing its duty for CIA by trying to pretend it is up front but its true purpose is to head off any credible discussion of the evidence and mire the subject in Swiftboat-type harassment from idiots and government internet ops spooks.
An example is the CNN link below where the subject is quickly diverted into moronic opinions divorced from any actual discussion of the evidence. Watch where the entire issue is avoided by CNN reporter Polk coming in and saying he doesn't think there's any new evidence so therefore there's no reason to re-investigate the crash. Who the f*** is Polk??? And where does he get the right to dismiss the entire subject without ever having shown 1) Any credentials or proven expertise to do so, and 2) Any earned right to do so via the facts? There's plenty of new evidence. In fact most of what is in the new documentary is new because the original investigation never officially addressed it and took pains to avoid it.
It's time to pull the gloves off on this media bullshit. If you print such an article in the face of serious evidence you should be held accountable on a serious legal basis. You should be charged with obstruction of justice under the color of journalism and have harsh penalties imposed on you. Those doing this scummy CIA dirty business under the power of major media should be charged with criminal interference and obstruction of justice, as well as acting against the interest of the people in pursuit of democratic rule of law. If you dare try to influence the outcome of a serious investigation by such dirty means like calling the people with the facts and evidence "Conspiracy Theorists" and denigrating them as having dubious psychological motives while completely avoiding the evidence as CNN does here then you should be held accountable at a serious legal level equal to the damage you do.
You can bet the Anderson Cooper show will be yet another fluff piece that heavily favors the government criminals and their contempt for the facts. I'd like to take that son of a bitch Polk on in a direct debate about there being no new evidence. Or a debate about CNN's poisonous non-journalistic coverage and its affect on America:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/20/us/twa-800...ary-debate
.
An example is the CNN link below where the subject is quickly diverted into moronic opinions divorced from any actual discussion of the evidence. Watch where the entire issue is avoided by CNN reporter Polk coming in and saying he doesn't think there's any new evidence so therefore there's no reason to re-investigate the crash. Who the f*** is Polk??? And where does he get the right to dismiss the entire subject without ever having shown 1) Any credentials or proven expertise to do so, and 2) Any earned right to do so via the facts? There's plenty of new evidence. In fact most of what is in the new documentary is new because the original investigation never officially addressed it and took pains to avoid it.
It's time to pull the gloves off on this media bullshit. If you print such an article in the face of serious evidence you should be held accountable on a serious legal basis. You should be charged with obstruction of justice under the color of journalism and have harsh penalties imposed on you. Those doing this scummy CIA dirty business under the power of major media should be charged with criminal interference and obstruction of justice, as well as acting against the interest of the people in pursuit of democratic rule of law. If you dare try to influence the outcome of a serious investigation by such dirty means like calling the people with the facts and evidence "Conspiracy Theorists" and denigrating them as having dubious psychological motives while completely avoiding the evidence as CNN does here then you should be held accountable at a serious legal level equal to the damage you do.
You can bet the Anderson Cooper show will be yet another fluff piece that heavily favors the government criminals and their contempt for the facts. I'd like to take that son of a bitch Polk on in a direct debate about there being no new evidence. Or a debate about CNN's poisonous non-journalistic coverage and its affect on America:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/20/us/twa-800...ary-debate
.