25-06-2013, 06:27 AM
I didn't read it that way. And if you follow the thread you will see that it was Hank who was upset about having his credibility threatened.
He then complained to Simkin about anyone questioning his sources or him having to defend his sources. Which I really do not understand.
I myself, opened up a thread on my book which had over 21, 000 views. And I would have been glad to answer questions as long as anyone wanted to ask them.
Hank did not like that and complained. And that was that.
FYI Tom:the guy that Janney wants everyone to think he found after all these years is the guy Tom found. And Janney found him through Tom.
Now, please follow: if you read Janney's book, Damore wrote a memo on his meeting with this CIA assassin. Said he talked to him for like four hours. Got tons of info on him. Vivid description.Which is all in the book.
The problem is this: That description does not jibe with the guy Tom found. And the guy Scully found fits the trial witness like a glove.
Now, if that is the case, then something is wrong somewhere. And I pointed out some of the problems in my review of that book. I did not spell them out since Damore is dead and canot defend himself or explain himself. But Janney never has explained this problem. In fact, he never has even acknowledged it.
If you don't understand these basic points, and your post indicates you do not, then you are behind the learning curve. And you should read up on these things before you pop in here and defend Simkin for doing something he should not have done.
He then complained to Simkin about anyone questioning his sources or him having to defend his sources. Which I really do not understand.
I myself, opened up a thread on my book which had over 21, 000 views. And I would have been glad to answer questions as long as anyone wanted to ask them.
Hank did not like that and complained. And that was that.
FYI Tom:the guy that Janney wants everyone to think he found after all these years is the guy Tom found. And Janney found him through Tom.
Now, please follow: if you read Janney's book, Damore wrote a memo on his meeting with this CIA assassin. Said he talked to him for like four hours. Got tons of info on him. Vivid description.Which is all in the book.
The problem is this: That description does not jibe with the guy Tom found. And the guy Scully found fits the trial witness like a glove.
Now, if that is the case, then something is wrong somewhere. And I pointed out some of the problems in my review of that book. I did not spell them out since Damore is dead and canot defend himself or explain himself. But Janney never has explained this problem. In fact, he never has even acknowledged it.
If you don't understand these basic points, and your post indicates you do not, then you are behind the learning curve. And you should read up on these things before you pop in here and defend Simkin for doing something he should not have done.