26-06-2013, 09:56 PM
Gordon Gray Wrote:Pictures are great. Logic is better IMO. I would advise you to watch the movie BLOWUP, by Antonioni. To quote Edwin Black's article on the Chicago plot: "[size=12]Documenting anything in the
conspiracy to assassinate John F.
Kennedy is practically impossible.
Worse, theoretical, often false,
statements have a way of reinforcing
themselves and slowly transforming
into truth in the eyes of
[/SIZE][size=12]investigators.
[/SIZE][size=12]And I can't think of better advice for anyone looking into this case than to follow his guidelines:
[B][size=12][size=12]"The one single foremost guiding
principle we pursued in this investigation
was trust no source, trust no
document, trust no government
official, trust no eyewitness, trust
nothing until it had been so severely
challenged, it could not be discredited."
[/SIZE]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/B]
that's pretty interesting Gordon... "Logic is better" BUT go watch a movie.... about photographs...
I agree completely that the evidence becomes unreliable once in our government's hands. Yet there is a weath of evidence that was NOT in their hands and NOT subject to their control, as well as in their hands yet somehow un-cleansed.
Any evidence that suggests Oswald's innocence of the crimes themselves WAS left in the record and should be viewed with understanding that most EVERYTHING ELSE was planted, altered, created, removed... (i.e. He changed his shirt and pants when he got home... what he was identified as wearing prior to that time cannot be paired with what he was wearing when arrested... Bledsoe, Whaley and a host of others wind up describing the "arrest shirt" as the shirt he was wearing when they see him, helps to identify which witnesses where "coached" much like planting the Lee HENRY Oswald in the 201 file to see where and who used this "tracking" name.)
Does our man from Dearborn strike you as an untrustworthy witness? A man who remained anonymous with knowledge of more duplicity. Has he been discredited in your eyes?
In this case specifically, the corroborated witness statements are much more indicative of what occurred than ANY physical evidence. As we have seen, the physical evidence of this case PROVES CONSPIRACY... and on purpose in my opinion... I don't think the "sponsors" even allowed the truth to hide in plain sight... amongst all the lies... for fear of discovery.
But in the end... SOMEONE did pull triggers... SOMEONE did insure protection of the guilty... what happened in DP must be the provenence of those who were there... not those who subsequently decided what happened.
=========
SPONSORS -- Those with the authority and motive to sanction the assassination and the connections to engage facilitating agents and systems.
Among them in my opinion: the most powerful supra-national entities who were -- and are -- above Cold War and Clash of Civilization cosmetic differences. -- Drago/Evica
O'Connor claims that JCS Gen Curtis LeMay was in the gallery at the autopsy smoking a cigar.... as many have written, those that participated would want a momento... unaltered photos, films, etc...
and the general knowledge that killers/planners/sponsors want to see the result of their planning...
I wrote many, many years ago that IMO the military brass was at the top of this pyramid -
in 1963... can you name how many involved in the case from any and all sides who did NOT spend time in the military?
Anderson, Taylor, LeMay.... Anderson, LeMay.... LeMay. Was there anyone of anything that did not come under the control of these three men?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter