27-06-2013, 03:04 PM
For those still interested in this charade:
(This was from Gary Mack)
Dawn.
Did you not attend the annual Bar convention? That's who came up with the idea to do a mock trial of Oswald, which was set in 1964 and, thus, limited to the information available at the time: http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpa..._oswal.php
In my twenty eight years of practicing law I have observed that lawyers, judges, DAs etc. are quite lacking in any understanding of the true facts of this case. With a few of notable exceptions like Jim Lesar, Dr. Pepper, Brian Kizzai, Dr. Wecht.
I have made many attempts to interest my colleagues over the years, to no avail.
So it's no surprise that this "trial" resulted in a hung jury.
I will have no further comment on this mockery. For Jim D the defense atty is named in this article.
Dawn
(This was from Gary Mack)
Dawn.
Did you not attend the annual Bar convention? That's who came up with the idea to do a mock trial of Oswald, which was set in 1964 and, thus, limited to the information available at the time: http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpa..._oswal.php
In my twenty eight years of practicing law I have observed that lawyers, judges, DAs etc. are quite lacking in any understanding of the true facts of this case. With a few of notable exceptions like Jim Lesar, Dr. Pepper, Brian Kizzai, Dr. Wecht.
I have made many attempts to interest my colleagues over the years, to no avail.
So it's no surprise that this "trial" resulted in a hung jury.
I will have no further comment on this mockery. For Jim D the defense atty is named in this article.
Dawn