01-07-2013, 04:41 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Thanks Joseph.
I interviewed Larry in Dallas myself on the Tippit case. I think this was in 1992.
God what a good guy he was. He told me he thought Tippit was shot at 1:08 or 1:09, he leaned toward the latter.
I am sure in your book that you try and explain all the problems with he ballistics evidence right? Especially why the bullets were kept in the file cabinet for what was it, four weeks?
I am not aware if you know this, but Armstrong makes a very good case that Oswald never picked up the handgun at Railway Express.
DId you build on that one? Because it is very interesting to me and credible.
Yes, Armstrong does a great job with the ballistics. There is no credible ballistics evidence linking
Oswald to the shootings. The "so-called evidence" produced actually exonerates Oswald by itself,
without all the other circumstances surrounding the events. I go into the Tippit ballistics in considerable detail and offer
some new theories about that aspect of the case. I help shred the official case in my close questioning of Detective
Leavelle, who gave me a very revealing interview that honestly admits a lot of the problems with it.
I go into close detail on all the mess surrounding the official case against Oswald
for the Tippit killing, which was as much a farce if not more so than the case
against him for shooting Kennedy. He would have walked if he had had a fair trial.
Henry Wade gave me another revealing interview. He knew he didn't have much of a case against Oswald for killing
Kennedy, admitted they didn't do much on the Tippit case, and even discussed his worries about getting a conviction against Ruby, despite
millions of people having seen him shoot Oswald on TV.

