My new book, "Into the Nightmare"

[Joseph McBride]

Joseph

Into the Nightmare is rising on the wishlist.

Mary Ferrell as playing a double game--joining the Association of Former Intelligence Officers, acting as The Gatekeeper;

more anecdotes accrue. Your analysis will be very helpful.

As for controversy, past the major step, that of certainty of conspiracy rather than theory, the first is Zapruder, the second alteration.

I don't see the turn, the stop, can't understand Hill's superhuman leap and the front seat agents' too-fast head turns, et cetera;

hence, the Horne scenario, two events at NPIC with Brugioni and McMahon, Zavada to the contrary notwithstanding, approximately pages 1100-1300 of Inside the ARRB Volume IV.

Alteration apparent in a six centimeter gash where the entry wound was inviolate in the two centimeter incision.

Groden cites eighty-one who saw the two-to-three-inch occipitoparietal avulsive wound, yet that perfect back of head photo profered.

Your work on Tippit is very useful. How Oswald fired automatic cartridges from a revolver with a defective firing pin he never received is a mystery.

As are the government's witnesses led like so many sheep versus say a Domingo Benevidez and Warren Reynolds and Aquila Clemmons dissuaded from the truth by gunfire either to the head of one's brother, one's own head, or merely threatened.

The reasoning has always been circular: Oswald shot Tippit and shot at Walker therefore shot Kennedy--when none of the three premises is true.

Taking them on and dispatching them is a great service.

Thanks very much, Phil. You bring up a lot of the key topics.

I appreciate the questions raised already and am glad people are getting the book to read
it in its entirety, which no doubt will prompt additional good questions and comments. There's
so much to discuss in this case, and the Tippit murder has been largely neglected, which makes
it all the more important to study and debate.