16-07-2013, 03:19 PM
In the second post of this entire thread, Bill Kelly responds to Bernice who started it with this:
Other than the NATO powers and their various outlets, the MSM, no one believes nor can they credibly hold this POV. Before our eyes we have a case study in how a color revolution is begun, nurtured, and and carried forwward.
To sustain this view, the skeptics of the validity of the Syrian revolution have to answer one question: How were the non-violent protests which in fact went on for months were made to appear spontaneous when they were a work of deep political alchemy? Or another way of framing this question, to what extent was opportunism by NATO and its allies a factor?
Quote:Bernice, I must politely disagree with this guy, whoever he is, from Argentina, who claims that it is the right of any government to stop successionists, and draws the false analogy of a state in USA wanting to succeed, when in fact this is a Revolutionary war, winner take all campaign and not an attempt by a separate state in Syria to succeed.
In addition, historically, the origin of the revolution in Syria is well documented, and it was inspired by the successful non-violent revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, and the violence was instigated with the arrests of young boys - children, not even teenagers, who spray painted anti-government graffeti on walls and were arrested.
Now the Syrian government and this guy is falsely saying that the revolt was inspired by foreigners, just as LBJ tried to pawn off any conspiracy on the Warren Commission. There is no foreign instigation to this revolt, it is simply a revolution by the people of Syria, primarily young people, who want freedom, democracy and justice.
Reporters are not even permitted in the country to cover the revolt.
You want to blame the Bilderburgers, USA, NATO or UN, go ahead, but they have had no influence or impact on anything that is happening in Syria today, as the UN won't even condemn the atrocities being committed by the government there. And not to support the revolutionaries is to support the brutal dictatorships, in Syria, Libya, Baharan and Yemen, right across the board.
The big conspiracy in Syria is not among those powerful institutions we have no control over, but by the government of Syria in the suppression of the revolt.
I just don't understand those liberals and radicals who take pride in opposing the US government and military on the one hand, and reject the democratic Arab revolt to support tyrants on the other.
Either you are with the revolution or you are with the tyrants, and there's no three ways about it.
Bill Kelly
Other than the NATO powers and their various outlets, the MSM, no one believes nor can they credibly hold this POV. Before our eyes we have a case study in how a color revolution is begun, nurtured, and and carried forwward.
To sustain this view, the skeptics of the validity of the Syrian revolution have to answer one question: How were the non-violent protests which in fact went on for months were made to appear spontaneous when they were a work of deep political alchemy? Or another way of framing this question, to what extent was opportunism by NATO and its allies a factor?
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl