17-07-2013, 09:27 PM
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:Bill Kelly Wrote:No Bill he never said that. It is my opinion, maybe i did not explain it right. I was being pessimistic, that if Carolyn did not bother to award Garrison, why someone like Tunheim, would care to fight for the truth, if the Kennedys do not. What her cousin Robert jr. revealed in January was too little too late, after all.Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:I don't understand what you said about the link tou Tunheim.
Can you explain it Bill?
Did Tunheim really say something about Caroline Kennedy not giving Garrision a Profile In Courage Award?
If so, I'd like to see and read where he says that, as that is interesting.
I'm not doubting you, I just want to hear it from the horse's mouth.
Thanks,
Bill Kelly
Okay, I get it.
I heard Tunheim speak a half dozen times when he was chairman of the ARRB, and not once did he proclaim Oswald guilty or poo poo conspiracy theories, but always insisted that his job was to identify, locate and release JFK assassination records to the public, and allow them to make up their own minds, as the law clearly dictated.
Now however, I have heard him quoted, as I quote him, saying Oswald was guilty and imagining a motive for him.
As a Federal Judge and former chair of the ARRB, he has to live by higher standards than ordinary citizens, who are allowed their opinions.
I am interested in any quotations by Judge Tunheim that reflects on this subject if anyone comes across any.
BK