25-07-2013, 12:52 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Joseph McBride Wrote:Tracy and Charles,
I'm sure we can agree to disagree on numerous aspects of
assassination-related research. I think that's part of what
makes it such a rich and complex field of study. We can't expect to fully agree
with any of us.
I most assuredly do NOT "agree to disagree" with Nelson or his champion Palamara regarding the former's fatally flawed contention that LBJ was the "mastermind" of the JFK assassination.
There is ZERO evidence to place LBJ within the Sponsor level of any reasonable assassination model.
There is, however, compelling reasons to conclude that the resurrection of LBJ as a FALSE Sponsor, timed to reach a peak during 50th anniversary commemorations, is designed to support the ongoing cover-up.
Joseph McBride Wrote:So I am pleased that [Palamara] found my book helpful as well.
Joe
So how would you react to a similar endorsement from Nelson?
"Agree to disagree" means having a tolerance for differing views
and a willingness to have free exchanges. I try to do that. I think
the assassination research community does not benefit from
the kind of infighting that is too common in it.

