My new book, "Into the Nightmare"

[Magda Hassan]

Charles:

The intensification of the LBJ-as-mastermind operation has been noted for some months now and is openly scheduled to continue through the fall. The work of one of its prime Facilitators, "author" Phillip Nelson (prime exponent of the "mastermind" characterization), recently was referenced on this forum and prompted a generally admirable JFK assassination author to note that we are obliged by the dictates of professional courtesy not to challenge the motives of our fellow correspondents, but rather to bow from the waist (my description) and politely "agree to disagree" with them when necessary.

Where does such courtesy end?

I presume you are referring to McBride here. I found this call for a polite disengagement to be disappointing on his part. Saying we must 'agree to disagree' should only come after every effort has been expended to be understand the argument of the other. But when the concern is to promote a book, one would never want to engage in a genuine dialogue which would expose its weaknesses. It would hurt business.

Not exactly Lauren. It was more Charles bringing off forum discussions here and due to recent correspondence I take it as a jab at Dawn and putting words in her mouth of which she never said. But you are not to know that. Just because Charles has declared war on Phillip Nelson doesn't mean every one else is required to enlist in that fight any more than Charles is required to give Nelson the time of day just because others might. On the other hand the merits or lack of merits of any book are absolutely fair game. Attacking the forum members is not. The distinction needs to be made and understood. You've been on the receiving end of attacks Lauren and I don't think it was pleasant for you. I and many others certainly were appalled at the way you were abused. Anyway, if Charles or you or any one else feels their questions have not been adequately answered you are free to note that or to reiterate the question/s again in case they have been missed first time around. Others will note the response and draw their conclusions. Or not. But keeping the means of basic civil communication open is important. Personal attacks just shut it all down.