04-08-2013, 02:19 AM
Ray:
With all dues respect, they are not rhetorical questions.
THey go to the heart of the matter I think.
When I saw Wilson at ASK, he put up an autopsy photo, I think it was the stare of death photo, and he pronounced that "David Lifton is right. They took the bullets out. You can see one right here." I didn't see any bullet there. But he said this in front of like 500 people.
WHen I talked to Groden about this after I was quite puzzled. Since I have a degree in film, and I have studied photography formally in clssroom situations. So I know something about the actual chemical process that was used back then. (Its all changed now of course.) And even though I knew something about the chemcial process, I had a hard time understanding the methodology behind Wilson.
When I talked to Groden, who knew even more than I did, I asked him, "Bob, I have never heard of anyone in all the literature I have read on film and photography saying you could do something like that. I don't understand how."
Groden said something like: Jim I don't either and I have spent my life in films and photos analysis. In my opinion, what he is talking about is not possible.
BTW, not even Lifton bought it, if memory serves me right. And it endorsed his theory.
Look, I know people in the industry who have worked in digital enhancement of films. And they are state of the art. They don't understand Wilson.
BTW, what book did Wilson write?
I know he was on that idiot's program, Nigel Turner, but I don't know if he wrote a book. I thought Phillips did.
With all dues respect, they are not rhetorical questions.
THey go to the heart of the matter I think.
When I saw Wilson at ASK, he put up an autopsy photo, I think it was the stare of death photo, and he pronounced that "David Lifton is right. They took the bullets out. You can see one right here." I didn't see any bullet there. But he said this in front of like 500 people.
WHen I talked to Groden about this after I was quite puzzled. Since I have a degree in film, and I have studied photography formally in clssroom situations. So I know something about the actual chemical process that was used back then. (Its all changed now of course.) And even though I knew something about the chemcial process, I had a hard time understanding the methodology behind Wilson.
When I talked to Groden, who knew even more than I did, I asked him, "Bob, I have never heard of anyone in all the literature I have read on film and photography saying you could do something like that. I don't understand how."
Groden said something like: Jim I don't either and I have spent my life in films and photos analysis. In my opinion, what he is talking about is not possible.
BTW, not even Lifton bought it, if memory serves me right. And it endorsed his theory.
Look, I know people in the industry who have worked in digital enhancement of films. And they are state of the art. They don't understand Wilson.
BTW, what book did Wilson write?
I know he was on that idiot's program, Nigel Turner, but I don't know if he wrote a book. I thought Phillips did.