Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

I am on my boat and so it'sn hard to do this now. I suspect one needs to understand what Tony attempts to prove and what are his premises. I think for starters he makes some assumptions about what did or happen.... and goes on from there. He ignores some evidence undermines his premises.

Bazant is not the issue and his work was theoretical not based on evidence of data from 9/11. The most reliable data is to be found at the 9/11freeforum by femr2, achimsopok, Tom and the site admin OWE. Their data is ignored and so from my prespective TS's work is fantasy which tries to pass as rigorous analysis. It's essentially GIGO. Tony refuses to use the best data for the movement of the parts of the building.

Zdenek Bazant's analysis has been proven invalid, and the NIST report had depended on it completely for vertical propagation. So there is now an incomplete section in their analysis. However, Jeffrey tells us there is no need to worry, implying Bazant was never important to NIST, and that we should just listen to him and the anonymous individuals he mentions. So in his mind there is no need for government reports and he is plenty satisfied with the word of anonymous posters and thinks the rest of us should be also.