Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
#22
Tony Szamboti Wrote:You are a strange duck Jeffrey. People here may not know that NYC CAN refused to have you involved in their outreach to NYC Council members after you annoyed the hell out of its director Ted Walter at the first council member meeting we had. I was there and heard it from Ted first hand how you were trying to revamp what they wanted to do. You did the same kind of thing once you worked your way onto the AE911 Truth board. The result there was a large number of people, including the normally sedate David Chandler, threatened to leave if you weren't removed.

If you aren't some type of shill muddying waters and smearing as necessary to keep the present official story of natural collapse intact and any threats to it at bay, I will eat my proverbial hat.



hahahaahahahahaha Nice one Tony.... you are excellent at revisionism

First of all I don't care about these paranoid people. But secondly AE911T could not tolerate anyone who simply did not repeat their talking points, someone who thought for themselves and asked questions. My questions raised contradictions with AE and they could not deal with confronting some of their mistakes.... like the distance and speed that steel (girders.... Chandler's misnomer) from tower 1. They were off by 50% and this was the easiest thing to verify. But they keep repeating this wrong statement over and over again and use it to shock and awe people to think there were bombs exploding the towers.

Chandler has been proven to be wrong and he's a petty guy who can't admit to his errors. Gage is nothing more than a nothing architect who is milking people for a new career and paying himself what amounts to something north of 100K to run around the world and do his revival like dog and pony show of BS.

Ted Walter contacted me and asked me to help. And I did the best I could to impress the Councilman for the need to investigate what happened on 9/11. I STILL think the investigation of NIST was rubbish... but not for the reason of CD or the inside job you are peddling. Ted Walter may have decided to not "USE" me for whatever reason... that AE911T was finding my independence "disruptive" to their straight and narrow message. I don't follow like a bot. I think for myself. The truth movement has a bunch of big mouth leaders... some even vying for attention... but all dependent on idiots to follow them blindly. They are basically nothing but delusional snake oil salesmen... some of which believe their own prattle... others know they are lying and don't care or figure it's easier to maintain the fiction than fess up to the truth.

No I am not a paid shill nor am I having fun doing what I do. I am only sharing my experience and hoping others will think for themselves and not blindly parrot as 99.999% do... and it is YOUR nonsense which they will cite as science and it's really rubbish like your missing jolt.

Being a board member I was privy to the financial shenanigans going on, hidden from the public. I could have exposed and embarrassed Gage and his crew. I did not. But he's no different from Jim Jones really... he runs a cult and milks people for money to do nothing but run his PR operation.

Have a nice day. Wake up... it's never too late.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 05-08-2013, 06:21 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,783 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,215 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,689 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,104 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,493 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,398 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,728 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,392 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,225 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,430 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)