05-08-2013, 08:21 PM
David Healy Wrote:Rob Caprio Wrote:...
By far the worse is ACJ where you can be attacked personally and slandered to the extreme.
...
David Von Pein is like the WC Report--at first he sounds good, but once you check out and compare what he is saying with the actual evidence in this case then you quickly realize he is blowing
nothing but hot air.
I have tried to join EF over the years, but they never seem to be accepting members, so how did you all become members?
Regarding alt.conspiracy.jfk (ACJ): if I recall correctly, most of your JFK assassination conspiracy related posts (if not all) were challenged regarding case evidence. Thusly leaving you in the
unenviable position of defending not only yourself and motive but what could be construed as misdirection and excessive massaging of the Warren Commission Report. As Conspiracy
Theorist impersonators are wont to do on occasion. Further re ACJ: having posted on that specific USENET forum for many, many years, myself and others have seen alleged CT's who have over time not only "seen"the Warren Commission Report **light**, but went on to be -or- still are .John Mcadams - Mel Ayton - Ken Rhan sidekicks...
Regarding Ed Forum: perhaps the EF felt you were ALREADY a member there, utilizing an alias, perhaps?
And, folks are savvy here, not much debate and JFK's assassination does not make up the majority of discussion here...
Mr. Healy,
You are entitled to your opinion, but if anyone reads the exchanges between me and your friend Ben Holmes they will quickly see it was HE who could NOT cite for his claims.
Since I have NEVER supported the WC Report I have no idea what you are talking about. I have a record on ACJ dating back to 2007 and one on JFKAssassination Forum dating back to 2010 so anyone can go search if they want, but they will NOT find one comment by me supporting the WC in anyway. So again, I am at a lost with your comment. Based on my debates with your friend Ben Holmes I had a clear vision of him either being totally confused and afraid to admit he did NOT know the evidence well, or he was a WC defender in hiding. Either way it really doesn't matter as ACJ is a place that is full of insults and slander anyway.
My series shows which side I am on and if you have an issue with any of the posts then let me know.
Regards,
Robert