07-08-2013, 09:43 AM
What we've been told has been false. Leaders of NIST less than forthright and should be investigated. Here is a thirty-minute overview:
A couple of inches of sag is not forty inches.
Phil's footnote:
Here's a parallel between NIST animation and CIA animation of TWA 800--a cartoon presenting a single bullet theory, support of official propaganda
In my view there is ample evidence of a false-flag Northwoods-like casus belli
The careful outline of Mr. Szamboti is akin to Gerald Knight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why
As Peter Dale Scott pointed out, the 9/11 Commission was a cover up
John O'Neill was FBI Counterterrorism chief, warned such an attack was imminent, was sabotaged and sidelined
I like Mr. Szamboti's signal to noise ratio
Magda
How do you relate your sense of the motives behind the collapse to Scott's new paper which I believe you posted in another thread
It certainly rocketed TSA to power and led to two decade long wars for arms and drug profit as well as to remain on-station for monitoring oil monopoly
Saudi interference is a useful concept for deciphering; OBL was involved in his family's construction--no doubt the whole family was saavy in demolition
"It appears to be a controlled demolition of the upper section"--did he just say that (!)
Unable to provide an explanation for total collapse--though that was their congressional tasking.
Six inch sag in an hour--not forty inches--and didn't account for bridge truss removal in test
This doesn't sound like an easily debunked analyst
98.5% of steel did not experience temperatures high enough to effect strength--
--but wait, that's the whole government case.
Can the government be that stupid--or is it dishonest.
Looking at the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission there is not much to choose.
It didn't happen that way and they know it.
But in each case they got a war out of it
Did they let it happen or make it happen or as Charles says yes
Sample size not big enough but the government's expert Gross determined the sample size--like having Cunningham say MC couldn't leave GSR but AEC Oak Ridge showing it did.
Orange yellow fluorescence is iron and steel not aluminum and organics
As Holmes remarked to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, touch him where we will he is false; so it is with the NIST theory
Exterior of building comes down fully all sides same time
What we see on the real video is not a natural collapse
At 21:00 1978 rig of City Bank Tower in secret retrofit at night not made public until many years later--Ryan anybody?
Were there or were there not sheer studs--NIST waffles
FOIA request denied as it "might jeopardize public safety"--why are they hiding
Refusal to release computer input data
Rapid oxidation, sulfidation and intergranular melting due to eutectic added, chemical substance to cause steel to melt at lower temperature in piece from 7
No comment from NIST
Fraudulent and probably criminal
None of the other steel from 7 was saved for analysis--
Gross negligence
South tower fires small and easy to control minutes before collapse
Molten steel in rubble of all three buildings--firemen on video said running like lava in channelways below
Did not test for explosives
A hundred people heard explosions
(more like TWA 800 all the time)
I would like to see more from Mr. Szamboti; his work is very like that of Lane, Meagher, McKnight in deconstructing the false story of a government commission.
A couple of inches of sag is not forty inches.
Phil's footnote:
Here's a parallel between NIST animation and CIA animation of TWA 800--a cartoon presenting a single bullet theory, support of official propaganda
In my view there is ample evidence of a false-flag Northwoods-like casus belli
The careful outline of Mr. Szamboti is akin to Gerald Knight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why
As Peter Dale Scott pointed out, the 9/11 Commission was a cover up
John O'Neill was FBI Counterterrorism chief, warned such an attack was imminent, was sabotaged and sidelined
I like Mr. Szamboti's signal to noise ratio
Magda
How do you relate your sense of the motives behind the collapse to Scott's new paper which I believe you posted in another thread
It certainly rocketed TSA to power and led to two decade long wars for arms and drug profit as well as to remain on-station for monitoring oil monopoly
Saudi interference is a useful concept for deciphering; OBL was involved in his family's construction--no doubt the whole family was saavy in demolition
"It appears to be a controlled demolition of the upper section"--did he just say that (!)
Unable to provide an explanation for total collapse--though that was their congressional tasking.
Six inch sag in an hour--not forty inches--and didn't account for bridge truss removal in test
This doesn't sound like an easily debunked analyst
98.5% of steel did not experience temperatures high enough to effect strength--
--but wait, that's the whole government case.
Can the government be that stupid--or is it dishonest.
Looking at the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission there is not much to choose.
It didn't happen that way and they know it.
But in each case they got a war out of it
Did they let it happen or make it happen or as Charles says yes
Sample size not big enough but the government's expert Gross determined the sample size--like having Cunningham say MC couldn't leave GSR but AEC Oak Ridge showing it did.
Orange yellow fluorescence is iron and steel not aluminum and organics
As Holmes remarked to Watson in The Adventure of the Three Garridebs, touch him where we will he is false; so it is with the NIST theory
Exterior of building comes down fully all sides same time
What we see on the real video is not a natural collapse
At 21:00 1978 rig of City Bank Tower in secret retrofit at night not made public until many years later--Ryan anybody?
Were there or were there not sheer studs--NIST waffles
FOIA request denied as it "might jeopardize public safety"--why are they hiding
Refusal to release computer input data
Rapid oxidation, sulfidation and intergranular melting due to eutectic added, chemical substance to cause steel to melt at lower temperature in piece from 7
No comment from NIST
Fraudulent and probably criminal
None of the other steel from 7 was saved for analysis--
Gross negligence
South tower fires small and easy to control minutes before collapse
Molten steel in rubble of all three buildings--firemen on video said running like lava in channelways below
Did not test for explosives
A hundred people heard explosions
(more like TWA 800 all the time)
I would like to see more from Mr. Szamboti; his work is very like that of Lane, Meagher, McKnight in deconstructing the false story of a government commission.