07-08-2013, 10:06 AM
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volum...Towers.pdf
Sustainability of Controlled Demolition Hypothesis For Destruction of Twin Towers
Tony Szamboti
Mechanical Engineer
February 17, 2008
Phil's note:
The pdf file opened readily for me and presented an orderly outline of anomalies which exclude the official explanation and observed phenomenon which suggest an entirely different mechanism caused collapse.
I would remind everyone absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and I find NIST and company to be completely Dulles you-have-nothing about the matter.
So, should someone pipe up and say there's no evidence of this or that, one might ask why no steel saved from 7, why no test for explosives, why denial of molten steel, and a series of like questions.
Amplification by this paper's author would be welcome here.
We're twelve years into this--after fifty the officials haven't come clean on the JFK assassination and there's no one suggesting he died of old age or natural causes.
Yet.
Sustainability of Controlled Demolition Hypothesis For Destruction of Twin Towers
Tony Szamboti
Mechanical Engineer
February 17, 2008
Phil's note:
The pdf file opened readily for me and presented an orderly outline of anomalies which exclude the official explanation and observed phenomenon which suggest an entirely different mechanism caused collapse.
I would remind everyone absence of evidence is not evidence of absence and I find NIST and company to be completely Dulles you-have-nothing about the matter.
So, should someone pipe up and say there's no evidence of this or that, one might ask why no steel saved from 7, why no test for explosives, why denial of molten steel, and a series of like questions.
Amplification by this paper's author would be welcome here.
We're twelve years into this--after fifty the officials haven't come clean on the JFK assassination and there's no one suggesting he died of old age or natural causes.
Yet.