08-08-2013, 10:18 PM
Rethinking Camelot?
[ed. note: I was never a Camelotian; a JFK activist of the time told me I'd die unmourned in a rat-infested garret]
Speaking of Chomsky's brain:
Chomsky must assume all the gears in a transmission are aware of the cerebration of the driver as he/she inserts the key/pushes START
Or he is Bugliosi-like in his bodacious boast that if Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, then Kennedy wasn't killed
One wonders in vain how Chomsky would address the problems of physics:
Oswald never owned the weapon, never occupied the "nest," never fired a shot, couldn't have effected the throat and temple wounds in the front from the rear
Is it Newthink then, that ability to hold two opposing thoughts
Johnson supposedly told the story of the teacher applying for the job before the small town school board which asked, "Is the earth round or flat?"
To which he eagerly replied, "I can teach it either way."
He's not faulty. He's simply pathological.
Some day we'll see a whole musical produced about the plotters which will have a nice long run
Simply Pathological
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5026[/ATTACH]
[ed. note: I was never a Camelotian; a JFK activist of the time told me I'd die unmourned in a rat-infested garret]
Speaking of Chomsky's brain:
Of all of these theories, the only ones of any general interest are those that assume a massive cover-up, and a high-level conspiracy that required that operation. In that case, the assassination was an event of true political significance, breaking sharply from the normal course of politics and exercise of power. Such ideas make little sense unless coupled with the thesis that JFK was undertaking radical policy changes, or perceived to be by policy insiders.
The scale of the presumed conspiracy should be appreciated. There is not a phrase in the voluminous internal record hinting at any thought of such a notion. It must be, then, that personal discipline was extraordinary among a huge number of people, or that the entire record has been scrupulously sanitized. There has not been a single leak over thirty years, though a high-level conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy and conceal the crime would have to involve not only much of the government and the media, but a good part of the historical, scientific, and medical professions. An achievement so immense would be utterly without precedent or even remote analogue.(pg. 37)
Chomsky must assume all the gears in a transmission are aware of the cerebration of the driver as he/she inserts the key/pushes START
Or he is Bugliosi-like in his bodacious boast that if Oswald didn't kill Kennedy, then Kennedy wasn't killed
One wonders in vain how Chomsky would address the problems of physics:
Oswald never owned the weapon, never occupied the "nest," never fired a shot, couldn't have effected the throat and temple wounds in the front from the rear
Is it Newthink then, that ability to hold two opposing thoughts
Johnson supposedly told the story of the teacher applying for the job before the small town school board which asked, "Is the earth round or flat?"
To which he eagerly replied, "I can teach it either way."
He's not faulty. He's simply pathological.
Some day we'll see a whole musical produced about the plotters which will have a nice long run
Simply Pathological
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5026[/ATTACH]