09-08-2013, 04:04 PM
This is just nonsense.
The distraction of the sound that Banfield heard was the stucture breaking and collapsing int he load trqasfer region below floor 7 as I mentioned. You can see the dust being ejected from this. And the low rumbling sounds are not percussive sounds that explosives make. This is typical of Chandler usinghis bias and attempting to dress it up with what appears to be scientific analysis.
Were there rumbling sounds associated with all the collapses? YES Just before or as motion begins (release) YES.
Please consider that sound travels 1100 feet per second. Witnesses on the ground would hear sounds of the twins tops crashing down 1 second after they could see it. This IS disorienting for sure, but none of these witnesses could connect the sound as occuring BEFORE the motion or collapse. The sounds were made AS the structure was collapsing.
Building 7 is hardly different. The banfield interview was conducted at leat 5 city blocks north of WTC 7 and by the time they heart something.... the rummble of the collapse... it is underway and they see the dust ejections... which they confuse as the pressure wave of an explosion. However it doesn't even LOOK like what an explosion produces.
More smoke and mirror of the prattling David Chandler who has mislead too many naive people.
Learn to think and analyze.
Truust but Verify.
You found this convincing because of your confirmation bias... you are hunting around to find proof of / for your fantasy. David is one hell of a snake oil salesman... but one of many.
What this clip does show is that the failure occured in the lowest floors where the load transfer structures were located... and supports the transfer truss theory as well as what the building's engineer Cantor believed. it refutes NIST and AE911T's fantasies. This is not sufficient evidence to deminstrate TTF, but one of many bits of evidence which in the aggregate supports that theory. All observations must support the correct theory.
The distraction of the sound that Banfield heard was the stucture breaking and collapsing int he load trqasfer region below floor 7 as I mentioned. You can see the dust being ejected from this. And the low rumbling sounds are not percussive sounds that explosives make. This is typical of Chandler usinghis bias and attempting to dress it up with what appears to be scientific analysis.
Were there rumbling sounds associated with all the collapses? YES Just before or as motion begins (release) YES.
Please consider that sound travels 1100 feet per second. Witnesses on the ground would hear sounds of the twins tops crashing down 1 second after they could see it. This IS disorienting for sure, but none of these witnesses could connect the sound as occuring BEFORE the motion or collapse. The sounds were made AS the structure was collapsing.
Building 7 is hardly different. The banfield interview was conducted at leat 5 city blocks north of WTC 7 and by the time they heart something.... the rummble of the collapse... it is underway and they see the dust ejections... which they confuse as the pressure wave of an explosion. However it doesn't even LOOK like what an explosion produces.
More smoke and mirror of the prattling David Chandler who has mislead too many naive people.
Learn to think and analyze.
Truust but Verify.
You found this convincing because of your confirmation bias... you are hunting around to find proof of / for your fantasy. David is one hell of a snake oil salesman... but one of many.
What this clip does show is that the failure occured in the lowest floors where the load transfer structures were located... and supports the transfer truss theory as well as what the building's engineer Cantor believed. it refutes NIST and AE911T's fantasies. This is not sufficient evidence to deminstrate TTF, but one of many bits of evidence which in the aggregate supports that theory. All observations must support the correct theory.