The Splintering Frame

[Rob Caprio]

Sorry Rob but I have to agree with Charles and Jan.

To call this garbage when you can't know if this did happen or not

I think some of us already have a fair idea as to whether it happened or not.

Is it just me or is there an upsurge of needlessly dumb and contrarian posts on the forum this last week or so? I'll give the contributors the benefit of the doubt, but the timing does make me wonder. Interns working at Cass Sunstein's office will probably be earning their pay over the next few months, that's for sure.

Anthony - yup.

The first few pages of this thread include an intelligent and informed exploration of the occult element of deep politics.

Indeed, the founders of DPF and many members have a genuine and long standing interest in this area, and there are numerous threads here on everything from literal alchemy to Jungian alchemy to deep political alchemy.

Rob - your post was garbage and rather than adding to the debate, risked dragging it into the tabloid gutter. If you want to talk black magic at kindergarten level, there are plenty of other websites out there.

Wow. This is very insulting and coming from a founding member of the board too. What is "kindergarten" about what I said? Do you not think the obviousness of the occult symbols of DP are relevant? I have a long standing interest in this area too and for you to say these things to me without even knowing this is very rude and condescending. I have about 21 posts here and you claim to know what I know and don't know or what I have an interest in? Please.

JFK was shot in the back, the throat and the head so what I presented by researchers that study the area of the Masons is NOT "tabloid gutter" material or junk just because you disagree with it.

I simply responded to a query by someone else and NOW that equals me destroying the debate? If I was paranoid like some of the people in the conspiracy world I would think you folks have gotten some bad information on me and what I stand for and seem determined to stunt my input.

I mean, I wanted to present WC evidence and that was equated with "spamming." Now I try to answer someone's query and I accused of passing on "tabloid gutter material." LOL.

Perhaps you folks do know a lot about this topic and the JFK assassination, but to think someone else does NOT based on one post is ridiculous IMO.

To each his own I guess.

You sure don't make new members feel welcome here, that is for sure.

Could you tell me what I should post about on this board? I would appreciate the feedback.

In the old days my attacks at least came from WC defenders.