09-08-2013, 05:31 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Quote:Your controlled demolition claim has trouble there because that is a basic indicator of weakness/stress-based initiation of the collapse.
Are you an engineer or did you get this from somewhere reputable? Or did you just make something up just now?
I think the controlled demolition proponents are so convinced of their beliefs that they fail to look at other simple explanations. KISS: The South Tower collapsed first because it had more weight above the heat-weakened damaged area causing more stress.
Why would they collapse the South Tower first if they were trying to imitate a natural collapse? Peter said all sorts of unpredictable screw-ups occur and maybe some CD devices had snafus that caused this. But if you stop to think how they would have fixed that it ventures into the preposterous. No chance it was because the South Tower had more weight above the impact zone that caused the collapse earlier than the North Tower? It sort of makes sense doesn't it?
The firemen had reached the fires in the South Tower a few minutes before it collapsed and radioed that they were there and that the fires were very manageable. Had they put them out the impact damage and fire ruse can't work. You might blow that off as a conspiracy theory, but if you believe there was a conspiracy concerning certain aspects of 911 then you can't just dismiss it.