Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:I call them cartoons... but I could call them sketches. That hardly matters. Like all drawings they are abstract graphics representations. I deal with drawings all the time and they are not reality.... nor are formulas reality... just another form of abstraction. as the core was destroyed column by column, or it was losing strength and lost its load carrying capacity that had to be picked up by the facade columns... the load was not disappearing. The loads were redistributed through the horizontal members including the hat truss. That is to say if you severed the columns several stories below the HT those still attached above the severed columns who have the part of the floor loads and their own weight and this load would then be hanging from the HT ... the columns would switch from compression members to tension ones. If he column splices held then the weight would add a series of concentrated loads to the bottom chord of the HT and these would add load the bearing points of the HT or the truss itself would fail and collapse. My hunch is that there would have been a very rapid increase in load and it would result in some buckling of the facade at some of the bearing locations of the HT.

As we can't see how the damage / weakening progressed we can't know precisely how loads were redistributed.. and I don't believe all the core columns of this region have been recovered and analyzed. That would show if there were explosive devices or if the core columns failed from heat, distortion, warping and connection failures. The pre release movements suggests a failure PROCESS over time not an instantaneous one... but the moment of release was when aggregate capacity dropped below the aggregate service load... and the failure raced through all remaining load bearing columns.

It seems that you allow yourself much more freedom in your explanation than science would allow. Hence, your your convoluted explanation ..... is inappropriate, as that did not happen in real life.

The horizontal propagation was extraordinarily rapid across the 98th floor (about 0.7 seconds), where no core columns had been affected by the aircraft and no more than two perimeter columns, as only the very end of the wing hit that floor. Doesn't that give you pause in your arbitrary assignment of severe column load capacity degradation?


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Tony Szamboti - 10-08-2013, 11:39 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,784 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,217 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,693 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,106 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,493 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,400 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,733 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,394 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,231 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,432 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)