Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Tony Szamboti Wrote:The perimeter would be pulled inward and fail causing the upper section to descend and impact the next story down and arrest. A one or two story fall does not produce enough kinetic energy to continue the collapse as it is significantly less than the column energy absorption.

Jeffrey thinks his ROOSD can begin right away but it can't as the floors could take 29 million lbs. of force, which is a static load of about five additional full floors with their live load. The dynamic load of one floor assembly would be nowhere near 5g's so ROOSD needs to wait until a sufficient number of floors have broken loose and gained momentum.



But this is a deficient model. In your model the flange effect caused by the perimeter frame being pulled in would then cause the falling section to wedge the lower section's perimeter frame outward. As it did this it would pull the fasteners for the floor pads to the inner core outward causing, once again, a misalignment of the core columns causing instant load failure. As I've repeated in several posts your model is fatally flawed because it fails to involve the necessary lateral forces that would necessarily be involved by physical design.

But that isn't what happened in my opinion. As I said, the pneumatic blast pressure from the falling concrete floor pads exited both outward and inward driving the floor pads off their mounts and downward in an accelerated dynamic that undercut the static resistance of the core columns as it progressed in a wave just ahead of that static resistance form.

Uh, I thought 12 floors fell above the collapse zone in the North Tower?


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 11-08-2013, 03:47 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,820 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,254 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,734 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,142 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,516 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,435 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,901 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,418 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,305 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,453 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)