Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Tony Szamboti Wrote:This is incorrect and you are just doing a giant incoherent hand wave here.



You can't get away that easily. If the antenna dropped first then the core beneath it gave way. That means the core throughout that 12 storey section failed. The source of that failure had to be at the damage area 12 floors below. That means the core failed in the damage area and the weight of the antenna caused it to fail. This 12 storey section then piled into the remaining tower below.




Tony Szamboti Wrote:There is no way for a collapsing floor to produce a focused jet coming out of just one area and your theory does not explain the focused jets on the corner of the building. The gain on microphones are not intended for long range. The Ashley Banfield audio was low but when combined with her actions became obvious as to what her reaction concerned. david Chandler explains this in his video about it.



That's just you saying that. However the floor itself is comprised of a reinforced concrete pad and steel pouring platform. When it fell it was backed by a huge solid pile of debris from the falling section above it. You have a very limited understanding of this process to the point - I'm sorry to say - of incompetence. I'm sorry but your answers above are very weak and show less than genuine reasoning since the Building 7 collapse was at considerable distance from Ms Banfield. If you recall there were media people with identical microphones very close to the North Tower when it fell. Speaking of incoherent. In short you can't explain why there was no such captured recording of your very prominent CD explosions. Nor did you bother to answer the explosive residue point. Very weak Mr Szamboti. Get back to me when you can explain the lack of detonation flashes in the falling tower.

When the floor pad hit the one below it there was a very focused area of pneumatic escape. I don't know why you are having trouble realizing that as a trained engineer.


I must have missed your answer. Where were the dust jets for the original controlled demolition charges that caused the collapse at the upper floors?


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 11-08-2013, 04:28 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,816 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,243 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,720 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,134 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,511 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,424 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,854 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,412 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,277 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,446 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)