Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:You appear to have read none of it.

Or if you have read some of it, you haven't understood it.

Exhibit #1:

Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Gladio was created after WWII as a check by the right on the leftists who were being supported by the USSR.

This is completely and utterly wrong. I have shown you why it is wrong. More than once. And then you drag Dawkins and biological determinism into it.....

DPF is not a deep political kindergarten.

Jan,

No I have not read any thread in this forum about Gladio. I have read material on the net about it for years and seen it discussed in several video/youtubes. I didn't feel my understanding was terribly off and nothing you have written disbuses me of that notion. Power and control wants more power and control... criminals hide who they and try to get others to pay for their crimes and so forth.

Further I joined the site for the sole purpose of discussiong the technical issues of the WTC. The political meaning is a much more subjective but certainly interesting topic. The two seem to intersect especially for those who see 9/11 as a false flag inside job CD.. and this view very much needs the CD or the event takes on a different agency... such as if it wasn't those creepy neocons NWO, mossad nexus pulling the strings... and there might have been actual disgruntled terrorists acting as in "blowback" 9/11 has a very different meaning... notwithstanding the outcome or response. I am well aware of the idea of left gate keepers and distrust of people like Chomsky because he has not jumped on the side of the truth movement. I don't know his position on the JFK matter, but I do know that even the conspiracy side hasn't agreed on what the conspiracy was but that the official account was a lie.

It certainly makes sense that people would get into the MIC and run their own agendas using their position of power. Creepy, unethical, duplicitious, deceitful, illegal and more... but that doesn't stop criminal minds ever.

Yea... what is presented as politics is just Kabuki... Things are not what they appear and not what we are told. Nothing new there.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 11-08-2013, 05:29 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,783 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,215 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,689 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,104 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,492 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,398 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,728 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,392 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,206 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,430 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)