11-08-2013, 07:44 PM
Tony Szamboti Wrote:Albert, there was a very detailed computer simulation of the impact done by the NIST. See NCSTAR 1-2. There were very few core columns damaged as the wings did not make it to the core. So by volume alone only a few core columns could be hit.
Your thinking regarding the structure below the 98th floor where initiation began is flawed. If that structure gave way first then the collapse would not have initiated at the 98th floor. I'll give you a reason the collapse started at the 98th floor. It was because it was the closest place to the impact where there was no damage and charges would not have been displaced. Even after the initiation the first floors to collapse where the 99th, 100th, and 101st floors. This is verifiable on video. Now why would four stories above the impact damage actually be the first to collapse?
NIST is fine when you agree with them and the devil when you don't. Shorter.. NIST did not produce reliable report, flubbed observations and came up with the wrong explanation for all the collapses but got some stuff right.
The mass of the plane... like 250,000 or whatever (look it up) and the fuel... did not disappear and it was moving at 450 knots. Do you know how much kinetic energy is the fuel alone has...not to mention the keel, the landing gear, the engine and so forth.
And the interior core damage is hard to determine has has not been documented by NIST... But one landing gear made it through the building and landed in a parking lot on Liberty Street...puny wheel.
We know the building showed movement before release... so it was coming apart up there and when enough of the frame was useless the whole top dropped and ROOSD began and no need to weaken the frame... and we know it survived the floor collapse anyway.
Face the truth... the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
There is no evidence for placed devices in the towers...