Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

Everything NIST did was not incorrect and it is ignorant to assume that all parts of a large report are incorrect based on a finding that one area is.

Your reading comprehension in this case stinks. I didn't say it was ALL wrong and I certainly will not sayu it was ALL RIGHT. I said they got the wrong conclusions... and made mistakes in the report.... There was a lot of valuable information as well.

But you can't be a little bit pregnant eh?

Being pregnant implies all or nothing and is not a valid analogy here.

It is possible for a report to be very accurate in certain areas and at the same time have less accurate or even incorrect areas with incorrect conclusions. That description is what I think sums up the NIST report on the WTC collapses. There are accurate areas and the aircraft impact seems to be one and can be validated by other means.