Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
The FBI was instructed to bury testimony and evidence counter to the lone gunman scenarioyet CIA still stonewalls on the basis of national security

Bertrand Russell noted this irony in 1964

At 368 Jeffrey Orling says

I have to say that all witness testimoney is insufficient in itself to prove anything and most of it is simply wrong.

At 369 Tony Szamboti says

Yeah, the witnesses are all just mistaken, just like the legendary Allen Dulles said everyone was who ran towards the grassy knoll after having heard gunfire from that end of Dealey Plaza.

It had to be electrical transformers blowing that they heard. Yeah, that's the ticket, transformers. When they explode walls fall apart in some other world. Maybe the place Orwell talked about.

Of course, Allen Dulles is very likely one of those who said the Zapruder film and its back and to the left motion of JFK's head was too much for the public to see so it had to be suppressed. What a shame that Jim Garrison broke it loose from the grips of Life magazine's vault for the trial of Clay Shaw. Life fought Garrison's subpoena all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court who had no grounds to dismiss it. What a shame the court wasn't able to stop it. This is also reminiscent of the court case to get the Oral Histories released. You know, the ones taken down in the four months after 911 where 118 firefighters and emergency workers talk about seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions. Again what a shame they weren't able to stop it and that they were ultimately released in August 2005. The American people don't need to be confused by hearing about explosives at the world trade center. It was just about the planes and fires. That's all they need to know.

These witnesses have to be mistaken. They have to be. When asked about explosives being involved at a press conference Rudy Giuliani turned and asked Bernard Kerik if there was any evidence of explosives, and Bernie said no, so the witnesses all have to be mistaken. Never mind that this is the same Bernie Kerik who went to jail for fraud a few years later after making millions with Giuliani on the coat tails of 911 as "security" specialists.


Phil's note: Googled for oral histories firefighters 9/11 and found

9/11 Firefighter Oral Histories, First-Hand Reports




It was the particular duty of Arlen Specter, Belin, Liebeler under the tacit tutelage of the godfather of American shadow government Allen Dulles with the full cooperation of the blinkered and blackmailed J Edgar Hoover to suppress any and all evidence and testimony contrary to the official propaganda.

So it is with the false-flag provocation and psychological shock treatment called 9/11.

In the former instance, the single bullet is impossible as an explanation for the frontal wounding of the inconvenient president who challenged the cabal.

In the latter and extant instance, the "natural collapse" or the "fire-weakened steel" or the "aircraft damage to core columns" together with the Bazant-NIST pile driver, that solid twelve-story roustabout, are powerless to explain the observed events.

The sole explanation of the murder of the president and the demolition of a spiritual repository in the heart of the major urban center is the impetus of the cabal to absolute power through summary violence, all in Dulles' blueprint of a strategy of tension.

Cheney may serve as an equivalent to Dulles providing the continuity presented over the course of the Century of the Fed, in which Preparata's Conjuring feeds steel in a cherry ingot to be stamped and turned on the five-axis lathes of the black agencies.

The towers were exploded. The firemen tell it, Allen Dulles-Cheney and his willing handmaidens to the contrary notwithstanding.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Phil Dragoo - 15-08-2013, 01:33 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,787 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,219 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,695 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,110 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,498 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,402 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,738 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,398 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,235 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,436 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)