Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Tony Szamboti]

So Danny.... what would a natural collapse of a huge skescraper look like?

Danny can speak for himself but I do want to say it would be something like one of the pyramids crumbling to the ground. It just would not have happened. No natural collapse to the ground of that type of structure has ever happened before and it didn't happen on 911.

The nonsense about a natural collapse with all of the evidence proving otherwise is nothing but (as Norman Schwarzkopf would say) bovine skedaddle.

So you're saying that the entire collapse was assisted by CD devices... top to bottom?

I can say unequivocally that the collapse initiations and at least the first several stories of the collapses were assisted in the North Tower and WTC 7 to get things moving. The columns are not involved in either the initiation or first several stories of the drop of both buildings and that is impossible in a natural collapse. After that it doesn't matter, as controlled demolitions generally only involve breaking enough material loose, and generating enough momentum, to let gravity finish the job. In WTC 7 it is very clear that it was eight stories taken out before letting gravity do the rest with the loosened material. It could have been nine or ten in the towers, and there may have been additional help on the way down at key points, such as mechanical floors and the perimeter corners.

The North Tower and WTC 7 collapses were with the utmost probability due to controlled demolitions.