15-08-2013, 05:19 PM
Definitive proof - in THIS case? No Gordon, just the word of civilians over the governement investigators and conclusions... pick your poison.
If there was no hole in the windshield it would have been meticulously documented... ala CE399.
The jar with metal scrapings FROM the windshield is empty.. while initialed by the same three people who initialed CE399... AFTER it gets to FBILAB... the chain of evidence before that? Not so good.
But here are the key items: There was no reason whatsoever to remove McHugh from the center front seat of the limo.... and given that JC was hit, possibly twice, the chance that he would be in the way for that shot was a risk worth taking - or so it appeared.
11/29/63 - AFTER the autopsy report... AFTER it was decided there where three shots from the rear... the man in FRONT of JFK would have been in the way of the shot... have you seen the FBI 3-shot recreation I posted showing a shot at z345? The FBI got it very close to correct very early... but simply dropped anything from the front in their recreation.... done months later... STILL does not acknowledge the SBT or the Tague bullet...
JEH: No He wasn't hit by the second one
LBJ: I say, if Connally hadn't been in his way
JEH: Oh, yes..yes.. the President would have no doubt been hit.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5090[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5091[/ATTACH]
There are no decent photos of the windshield (or the trunk, hood, front interior, or interior/exterior of the SS followup car which may have been sprayed with blood)
There are at least 6 witnesses to a thru and thru hole...
WHO says there was no hole ? The FBI? The Secret Service? (Greer says there wasn't even a crack)
Do you believe the Ford Plant story of making duplicate windshields so the SS could use them for "practice"
I'm sure you've encountered this with all the other evidence... if it's against Oswald it is well documented (false or otherwise) and shown front and center...
But a bullet hole in the windshield - which would have the same kind of close-up photos made as the rest of the evidence... Didn't.
I was able to make this enlargement/negative of the FBI garage photo... Have you ever tried matching that to CE351?
Was there a bullet hole Gordon - Well... when citizen witnesses say one thing and the government investigation tells us the opposite....
The proof of the crack is the same as the proof that Oswald bought C2766 - "take the FBI's word for it"....
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5088[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]5089[/ATTACH]
If there was no hole in the windshield it would have been meticulously documented... ala CE399.
The jar with metal scrapings FROM the windshield is empty.. while initialed by the same three people who initialed CE399... AFTER it gets to FBILAB... the chain of evidence before that? Not so good.
But here are the key items: There was no reason whatsoever to remove McHugh from the center front seat of the limo.... and given that JC was hit, possibly twice, the chance that he would be in the way for that shot was a risk worth taking - or so it appeared.
11/29/63 - AFTER the autopsy report... AFTER it was decided there where three shots from the rear... the man in FRONT of JFK would have been in the way of the shot... have you seen the FBI 3-shot recreation I posted showing a shot at z345? The FBI got it very close to correct very early... but simply dropped anything from the front in their recreation.... done months later... STILL does not acknowledge the SBT or the Tague bullet...
JEH: No He wasn't hit by the second one
LBJ: I say, if Connally hadn't been in his way
JEH: Oh, yes..yes.. the President would have no doubt been hit.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5090[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5091[/ATTACH]
There are no decent photos of the windshield (or the trunk, hood, front interior, or interior/exterior of the SS followup car which may have been sprayed with blood)
There are at least 6 witnesses to a thru and thru hole...
WHO says there was no hole ? The FBI? The Secret Service? (Greer says there wasn't even a crack)
Do you believe the Ford Plant story of making duplicate windshields so the SS could use them for "practice"
I'm sure you've encountered this with all the other evidence... if it's against Oswald it is well documented (false or otherwise) and shown front and center...
But a bullet hole in the windshield - which would have the same kind of close-up photos made as the rest of the evidence... Didn't.
I was able to make this enlargement/negative of the FBI garage photo... Have you ever tried matching that to CE351?
Was there a bullet hole Gordon - Well... when citizen witnesses say one thing and the government investigation tells us the opposite....
The proof of the crack is the same as the proof that Oswald bought C2766 - "take the FBI's word for it"....
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5088[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]5089[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter