17-08-2013, 04:20 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Where we are is your spun video where you collected the statements of every and any one who said "boom" on 9-11 was made to look like a witness to the alleged controlled demolition blasts. Especially the ones who said "Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom," as if that was witnessing of timed demolition charges similar to those contended by Chandler in his droning video where he makes-up what he wants to see as he goes along. The point that you have yet to answer was that if those booms were the demolition charges that were heard so easily by those witnesses then why didn't Burkett's microphone pick them up? You didn't really answer that. You tried to say that they were drowned-out by sirens, however the ABC video shows it was amazingly quiet around Burkett at the time. Also your boom video mixes random booms with timed demolition charges. The video didn't explain the technical aspect of the random isolated explosions they were showing. What were they doing, loosening the Tower slowly? If they had ripple charges up above, as Chandler is claiming, why then did they need those isolated explosions? Your claims are reckless, obviously made up to throw anything in that you can to suggest CD, and lack any technical explanation.
Meanwhile Tony disappears and doesn't offer a word over these conflicts. Real credibility there and a strong feeling of righteousness that his claims are valid and can be defended. Also, I've pointed-out several times now that Chandler claims the initiation charges were explosions while Tony admits the dust plumes up there are too slow so therefore they must have been burning cutter packs. That's a conflict that deserves a response yet not a peep from those who are so convinced of their rightness. They can just go with a sort of mushy "Well, it was something like that," just like Burkett's explosion above. You know, sort of like a general explosion that goes "boom". That's good enough. You see what I'm getting at here...
I'm really impressed by Tony's ability to come in and defend his corner column charges claim. Something that is obviously bogus by the simple forensics visible to the naked eye. Again, just another make-it-up-as-you-go-along, Cinque-like claim by Chandler who is trying to see things in the video that aren't there.
The dust jets in the North Tower are far too big to be demo charges. They are caused by the collapsing floors and ROOSD. You can see with the naked eye that they originate from the outer frame wall right on the edge of the floor pad. They are also in synch with ROOSD.
It is hardly reckless to connect the structural behavior which has the fingerprints of controlled demolition, such as no columns being involved in the resistance to collapse, with anecdotal evidence of charges in the building. This should be investigated and it hasn't been. The points you make that there was no sound picked up by microphones is spurious at best. Charges can be tamped and we know nano-thermite can be tailored for sound levels and explosiveness.
What I would call reckless and actually ridiculous is your characterization of the focused corner blowouts seen in the Chandler video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8 as being due to ROOSD.