17-08-2013, 06:14 PM
Tony Szamboti Wrote:Your points have been answered and you have not ever explained why the columns would not be involved. All you are doing is saying otherwise. You are like a kid denying something in the face of clear evidence.
You're dodging the technical forensic arguments about the corner columns. Let it be duly noted.
You're also dodging answering why you and Chandler differ on such an important aspect as the type of initiation device. Also, duly noted.
Your dampered blasts claim was refuted by the fact your own witnesses in your own video claimed they were very loud and audible. Also, not answered. Also duly noted.
You know as well as I that those witnesses in your own video are referring to "booms" that are much louder than those in the Banfield video. Do we need to go back and look at them saying they heard "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom" in the context of those being timed charges blasting the floor columns? Also your own collapse video claims the prominent dust jets shooting out of the Tower were responsible for those booms (Which is pure evidence they weren't dampened isn't it?). There's no way that such a forthright and audible event as told by the witnesses would be missed by Burkett's microphone and you haven't come up with an answer for that.