Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Albert Doyle Wrote:This is why Chandler is dishonest because there's no reason he couldn't show you these videos of the South Tower. If you watch the whole video there's several close-up videos from the southeast and northeast sides of the collapsing South Tower that show an important uniform cascade of ROOSD floor collapse and dust bursts. If you watch the video intelligently you can see clear as day the timing of this dust burst waterfall down the walls of the tower is perfectly in synch with ROOSD and is not timed correctly to be core demolition. Also any idiot can see the robust waterfall-like nature of those bursts is too thick and extensive to be from explosives. The only thing that could push so much material at that precise speed and thickness would be floor collapse.

There's even more ROOSD gold in these videos. You can see two distinct types of dust bursts as the top section of the South Tower collapses. The first are the dust plumes caused by the initial collapse. The second type are those robust cascading uniform dust bursts that are the obvious result of the top section initiating ROOSD. There's clearly a difference between the two which means the second is from a different cause than the first. What a coincidence that it just so happens to be perfectly timed with the top section setting off ROOSD in the bottom section. Watch the video closely. The top section hits the bottom and the dust burst waterfall evidences the setting-off of ROOSD.

It's obvious why Chandler didn't show you this:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhyu-fZ2nRA



.
There is no question that given enough momentum the collapses could self-propagate. However, it needs time to develop momentum so this ROOSD can't occur immediately. The assistance would have occurred at the beginning of the collapse and for the first ten stories or so. That is what can't be explained naturally, with the columns not being involved, the rapid horizontal propagation across the initiating story, and the high acceleration through the first story and the next several stories before ROOSD could even occur.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Tony Szamboti - 17-08-2013, 11:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,783 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,215 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,689 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,104 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,493 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,398 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 14,728 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,392 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,224 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,430 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)