Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Albert Doyle]

Tony, you've got a serious forensic problem because the clips I cite above show a first floor dust burst that occurs over a full second after the drop of the South Tower's top section. This irrefutably scientifically proves beyond a doubt that those bursts can't be from explosives because their timing is way too late to be from explosives. There irrefutably can't be any core-destroying explosives involved in that first storey burst because it obviously happens over a full second after the top section drops. This disproves your "first ten stories of assist claim" as far as Chandler's claimed explosives. So therefore they are from ROOSD (as was obvious).

You've got a serious problem because those dust blasts are no different than those shown to us by Chandler on the North Tower. Blasts that Chandler openly claims are caused by explosives charges designed to destroy the Tower. How does this proof of those dust bursts not being explosives reflect on Chandler's claims involving the North Tower? And do any of you ever wonder why Chandler chose not to show you this extreme example of dust jets on the South Tower? Is it because he knew they disproved explosives from the delay in timing?

You have a real problem because this means your own witnesses' "Boom, boom, boom, boom, booms" can't be from CD explosives. At the very least you have presented easily-disproven, bogus claims to the public.


Try following the arguments and answering them directly next time Tony...