18-08-2013, 11:06 PM
I just realized Tony has managed to dodge two important points by switching the subject. The first is the delay in the South Tower's dust bursts. I explained that the video I linked clearly shows the top section of the South Tower plunge into the bottom section. If you view the clips I cited (and Tony didn't respond to) you can see this clearly and without any doubt. After the top section hits the bottom section there's over a second of delay until the first floor's dust burst emerges. You have to remember Tony and Chandler claimed that the dust blasts seen on the North Tower were the result of core-destroying explosives. If the dust bursts seen on the South Tower originated from similar explosives then according to their theory they would have to have happened prior to the collapse of the top section. Tony said the inner core had to be loosed by cd devices in order to avoid the predictable static resistance they would have provided. But if you look at video the dust bursts don't happen according to that timing. They happen as much as 2 seconds or more after the necessary juncture Tony and Chandler require for them to be explosives. That's proof that they aren't explosives because they are impossibly late to be from explosive charges. It's proof Chandler is giving incorrect information.
The next point Tony never bothered to give any answer to was the blasts being caught on Banfield's microphone. Although the blasts Chandler shows on Banfield's video were caught 5-10 blocks away, and originated from inside Building 7 with no dust jets penetrating the wall, they show up on the audio registration Chandler shows us. Yet with repetitive booms emphatically witnessed by many people, and a microphone that was literally right under the source, and blasts that allegedly penetrated the walls significantly, we don't have any such registration. Having found it on Banfield's video you know Chandler must have looked for it with the South Tower. He must not have found it. So my question is how did Banfield's microphone manage to capture demolition blasts but Burkett's didn't? Especially the prominent blasts shown in Chandler's video bursting down the side of the building?
No switching subjects or saying inconsequential. Just two straight honest answers to these questions please.
The next point Tony never bothered to give any answer to was the blasts being caught on Banfield's microphone. Although the blasts Chandler shows on Banfield's video were caught 5-10 blocks away, and originated from inside Building 7 with no dust jets penetrating the wall, they show up on the audio registration Chandler shows us. Yet with repetitive booms emphatically witnessed by many people, and a microphone that was literally right under the source, and blasts that allegedly penetrated the walls significantly, we don't have any such registration. Having found it on Banfield's video you know Chandler must have looked for it with the South Tower. He must not have found it. So my question is how did Banfield's microphone manage to capture demolition blasts but Burkett's didn't? Especially the prominent blasts shown in Chandler's video bursting down the side of the building?
No switching subjects or saying inconsequential. Just two straight honest answers to these questions please.