20-08-2013, 12:15 PM
Tony
At 464 above you note
In fact, the video with the firefighters and other workers talking about explosions inside the building has never been seen on mainstream TV as far as I know. One of the only reasons we have seen some of this is attorney James Gourley's successful lawsuit against NIST around 2010, which forced them to release a lot of video that was being suppressed. The information was then put on the Internet.
Kind of sounds like the suppression of the Zapruder film and witnesses who mentioned hearing shots which they believe came from the underpass side of Dealey Plaza to the front of the limousine carrying JFK. One of the most heinous early attempts to keep the Kennedy assassination as being done by one shooter in the TSBD came from Life magazine, who had the Zapruder film. It was due to Parkland doctors calling the frontal throat wound an entrance wound. Life tried to say the Zapruder film showed JFK turning around to see where the first shot came from and that this would have been when he was shot in the front of the throat. Of course, the Z-film was suppressed and the public would not see it for years. It turned out that the Z-film showed nothing like this.
Two events of deep political importance. In the former, the president was killed in a crossfire so that a war could proceed, and for other purposes. In the latter, a craven attack against civilians was staged. . .so that two wars could proceed, and. . .for other reasons.
Frames of Zapruder were reversed to imply the president's head moved forward from a shot from the rear. Photographs of the rear of the head were made to appear pristine. The "patsy" was framed with a forged cover photo on a national magazine. Stray bullets were policed up, an autopsy was adulterated, the record, in short, reflects a contrived cover up to support an a priori explanation consistent with the uses of power.
The towers present as examples of controlled demolition, not heat-weakened steel from aircraft impact. Additional charges are denied. Witness testimony is suppressed and relevant investigation is avoided, e.g., "no evidence of explosives; why look for them"--
In each case we the people are supposed to accept Mommy and Daddy's Because-I-Said-So.
Adequate demonstration has been shown to posit charges were placed. Ryan has begun to explore possible mechanics.
In mass murder the statute of limitations is open-ended.
At 464 above you note
In fact, the video with the firefighters and other workers talking about explosions inside the building has never been seen on mainstream TV as far as I know. One of the only reasons we have seen some of this is attorney James Gourley's successful lawsuit against NIST around 2010, which forced them to release a lot of video that was being suppressed. The information was then put on the Internet.
Kind of sounds like the suppression of the Zapruder film and witnesses who mentioned hearing shots which they believe came from the underpass side of Dealey Plaza to the front of the limousine carrying JFK. One of the most heinous early attempts to keep the Kennedy assassination as being done by one shooter in the TSBD came from Life magazine, who had the Zapruder film. It was due to Parkland doctors calling the frontal throat wound an entrance wound. Life tried to say the Zapruder film showed JFK turning around to see where the first shot came from and that this would have been when he was shot in the front of the throat. Of course, the Z-film was suppressed and the public would not see it for years. It turned out that the Z-film showed nothing like this.
Two events of deep political importance. In the former, the president was killed in a crossfire so that a war could proceed, and for other purposes. In the latter, a craven attack against civilians was staged. . .so that two wars could proceed, and. . .for other reasons.
Frames of Zapruder were reversed to imply the president's head moved forward from a shot from the rear. Photographs of the rear of the head were made to appear pristine. The "patsy" was framed with a forged cover photo on a national magazine. Stray bullets were policed up, an autopsy was adulterated, the record, in short, reflects a contrived cover up to support an a priori explanation consistent with the uses of power.
The towers present as examples of controlled demolition, not heat-weakened steel from aircraft impact. Additional charges are denied. Witness testimony is suppressed and relevant investigation is avoided, e.g., "no evidence of explosives; why look for them"--
In each case we the people are supposed to accept Mommy and Daddy's Because-I-Said-So.
Adequate demonstration has been shown to posit charges were placed. Ryan has begun to explore possible mechanics.
In mass murder the statute of limitations is open-ended.