20-08-2013, 10:25 PM
Can anyone demonstrate he is not wrong but lying? It's a simple and important challenge. How does an agent convince this man to lie and obfuscate? Cash? Fame? When would this have happened? At the beginning of his activism in the early 60's or after JFK' was released? Is there any supporting evidence to support Chomsky as a "gatekeeper"? I have not seen one piece, but I am not claiming such evidence could not exist. I'm not only trying to defend a man who has accomplished more than any of us ever will and who at the same time seems to be uncommonly ethical, I am also asking the critical community for some evidence and methodology. To paraphrase the case as I understand some making: "any leftist who publishes or speaks publicly to their perception that JFK was just another politician in line with Defense and Intelligence and was killed by a nut is de facto a paid propagandist". Is it implied that such an individual cannot make an ideologically driven mistake, for example.

