20-08-2013, 11:01 PM
Magda Hassan Wrote:The title and discussion of this thread is 'Some misunderstandings related to WTC collapse analysis'. For some one with Jeffrey's lineal thinking to throw some thing else into the mix is off topic. We all know Jeffrey is out of his depth when it comes to deep politics. But in terms of looking at the 'collapse analysis' it's been good. So has Tony's contribution.
Magda,
I don't know that my thinking is linear or not... but that sounds like something not to ascribe to. I am not a student of deep politics and don't accept or reject it because I haven't jumped in. If I did perhaps I would be in over my depth. I am more like a fish out of water here... re the technical discussions about 9/11... because I try to be objective and technical... and not see the technical event through a political filter. Obviously that is verboten if one is a deep politician (is that an ok term?) Or is it deep political thinker?
I've not even studied the Pentagon and Shankesville and can only speculate or cite someone else's work.. so I don't do that anymore. Both of those appear to be not what the official account said they were.
In the end 9/11 is to me hard to tie up in a neat package because we are missing a lot of information and the only neat packages are those where you don't bother to know what's really inside. And that's exactly the same as the OCT.
Of course never knowing accrues more power to those already in power. Is that deep politics or real politik? Or something else?