Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Peter Lemkin]

I say there is not enough evidence for or of CD and so one should have the default that it was natural.

Well at least you've implicitly acknowledged that there is evidence of CD, now if only you could get over the notion that one should have a default conclusion rather than all hypothesis to the same burden of proof.

This is either folly of a near criminal kind - or disinformation. There was nanothermite and nanothermite residue in the dust - enough to calculate out to tons of it, originally. Add to that the floors struck by the planes [likely computer guided] hit the very floors in each of the two of the three towers hit that were undergoing work on the beams [for new fireproofing and other upgrades near the beams!]. There is more, but why waste one's time arguing with someone at best only trying to pedal his theory 'widely held' by one person -ONLY; or a disinfo agent here to waste our time, at worst. When one adds that his theory doesn't account for the energy expended in the collapse [greatly more than the gravitational potential energy], nor the pyroclastic cloud, nor the squibs, nor the sound of explosions, nor the explosions seen and heard in other locations, nor the fact the fires were out and cool after about 20 minutes, nor the collapse of WTC7 in the same manner with minor fires and also having explosions, nor the cover-up, nor the destruction of evidence, nor the non-investigations, nor the impossible disappearance of the huge separated top of one tower, nor the lateral projection huge distances of beams weighing tons, nor the melting and twisting of enourmous core beams, nor the molten metal that was molten for months....give it up.....this is insanity parading as voodoo 'science'.