23-08-2013, 11:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-08-2013, 01:37 PM by Tony Szamboti.)
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Tony, you seem to have forgotten our own Albert Doyle. This was his first contribution before he realized you were too cowardly to face the onslought of his powerful intellect.
Quote:Is it possible the inner core/outer frame structure caused a lateral force that was exacerbated by the floor platforms falling into the void caused by this lateral shift and ensuing removal of the floor platform supports that caused an unexpected massive kinetic force that drove the collapse of the inner core therefore defeating the expected resistance models you cite? In other words the resistance wasn't there because the outer frame and inner core both shifted away from the floor supports causing that mass to plunge unobstructed therefore causing the force it would have taken to overcome the column energy absorption you cite? When those inner core columns were compromised by that lateral force they would no longer possess the vertical resistance you cite. This failure would be almost instantaneous and not possess the expected deceleration you cite.
And Jeffrey annointed him as one who had really gotten the point.
Yes, thanks for the reminder that Jeffrey made it a point to approve of him in spite of the arcane, ridiculous, and in some cases, like your quote above, demonstrably impossible ramblings, we were treated to by Albert. Of course, this proves the point that Jeffrey has an unjustified bias, which can only be explained by his having an a priori agenda.
In the meantime, Jeffrey claims it is others at AE911Truth etc. who are not objective. I think it is a general technique of the trade called projecting, where the propagandist publicly claims their adversary is doing what the propagandist is actually guilty of, and in a sense beating their adversaries to the punch.