Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Jeffrey proposes the hat truss system distributes load into the vertical columns. My understanding is that the spandrals (sp?), the horizontal steel beams which tie the vertical columns into a kind of web surrounding the buildings, serve to distribute load in a very significant way. How would this load distribution system compare with that of the hat truss system?

The twin tower walls were vierendeel trusses... almost like the entire side was a single plate made up of the 10'x36 panels. The weakest link here was the connections themselves.. the bolts used to connect one panel columns and spandrels to the other.

The hat truss was a multi story structure which spanned the entire footprint and all the core columns were integrated into this structrure. Think of the core as the trunk... the hat truss as the branch system... almost.

The hat truss was designed to support the massive antenna which put a 360 ton concentrated load on 3 of the smallest core columns. So the hat truss spread the load to the rest of the core and even some of the facade since it was the entire foot print in plan. It also acted like an end plate for the tube structure of the facade and the entire top 3 floors where NOT framed with the lightweight open web trusses by very heavy steel beams as all the mech floors were. So the entire top 3 floors were a rather massive steel frame with many disagonal members providing rigidity like a truss bridge structure but in 3 dimensions.

When the core columns at floors 93-5 lost their ability to carry load the columns above would be hangin (in tension) from the hatt truss. This meant that instead of the loads bearning DOWN.. they were being HUNG from the hat truss. This meant that those loads had to find (and did for a while) alternate load paths to bedrock... through the remaining columns... some core and some facade. As the core columns "dropped out* of the support *game* more and more load was transferred to remaining columns. When the hat truss could no carry the loads the core columns broke free and all hell broke loose... the facade was pulled downward... and it was translated

THERE WERE NO COLUMN TO COLUMN COLLISIONS... the entire top was rotated and distorted at that instant...the entire upper fls had broken free INSIDE the dropping facade and were what became the initiating ROOSD mass.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 23-08-2013, 06:42 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,998 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,240 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 4,049 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,555 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,733 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,721 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 10,688 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,701 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 9,258 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,487 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)