24-08-2013, 11:38 AM
It's all so familiar ...
This "debate" has just about reached a point of diminishing returns similar to that reached by the JFK assassination conspiracy/LN "debate".
The Facilitators responsible for maintaining the JFK cover-up do not wish to win the LN "argument," but only to prolong it indefinitely -- and with it, the uncertainty upon which minority control of an overwhelming majority depends.
Orling, with his essential LIHOP/MIHOP distinction-without-a-difference, presents a classic limited hang-out -- one that has the effects of factionalizing the 9-11 research community and driving it into endless internecine conflict.
Szamboti nobly shreds Orling over and over again. Orling could not be happier about it.
Why?
Because their back-and-forth extends a faux "debate" that in fact was settled years ago.
And let's not lose sight of Orling's latest give-away of what in my constitutionally protected opinion is his deep political agenda: his warm endorsement of "Albert Doyle's" nonsensical if near-eloquent "scientific analyses" offered in support of the Orling fiction.
Facilitators of the JFK cover-up are not allowed to post on DPF -- in theory and almost always in practice.
When will this prohibition be broadened to include Facilitators of the 9-11 cover-up?
This "debate" has just about reached a point of diminishing returns similar to that reached by the JFK assassination conspiracy/LN "debate".
The Facilitators responsible for maintaining the JFK cover-up do not wish to win the LN "argument," but only to prolong it indefinitely -- and with it, the uncertainty upon which minority control of an overwhelming majority depends.
Orling, with his essential LIHOP/MIHOP distinction-without-a-difference, presents a classic limited hang-out -- one that has the effects of factionalizing the 9-11 research community and driving it into endless internecine conflict.
Szamboti nobly shreds Orling over and over again. Orling could not be happier about it.
Why?
Because their back-and-forth extends a faux "debate" that in fact was settled years ago.
And let's not lose sight of Orling's latest give-away of what in my constitutionally protected opinion is his deep political agenda: his warm endorsement of "Albert Doyle's" nonsensical if near-eloquent "scientific analyses" offered in support of the Orling fiction.
Facilitators of the JFK cover-up are not allowed to post on DPF -- in theory and almost always in practice.
When will this prohibition be broadened to include Facilitators of the 9-11 cover-up?
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene