25-08-2013, 08:29 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:No 'explanation' that works for WTC 1 and 2 could possible work for WTC 7 - proving that any such 'explanation' short of CD is but a desperate gambit to support the unsupportable 'officially and knowingly wrong version'. WTC was constructed totally differently and quite asymmetrically, yet it collapsed in almost the exact same way - again only CD explains this. Add to that the nanothermite chips and residue; the excess energy output; the explosions seen and heard; the planes hitting 1 and 2 exactly at the same floors that had undergone retrofitting of the fire-insulation and other upgrades; those with pre-knowledge of the event; the molten steel in the basement of all three towers for months...and on and on [I'm leaving out about 30 other things that lead most without an agenda to support the government to believe controlled demolition occurred]....What I hear from Orling is starting from a desired 'outcome/explanation' and working backwards; rather than working with the evidence, as it stands, and trying to work out what happened.
Those at AE4911Truth that I emailed said you had your alternative views when there; and they felt increasingly uncomfortable about your presence there among them. Some thought you just a bit eccentric, and some wondered if you weren't infiltrating the organization. Some were all the more suspicious that you had maneuvered to be close to the lead person in the group. To my knowledge, you convinced no one when you were there or since. IMO your theory fails on WTC 1 and 2 and misses by a giant margin on WTC 7 - though they all collapsed in the same manner. To me the most suspicious thing is you've stated your 'theory'....so leave it said...but whenever [WHENEVER] someone posits controlled demolition you seem to take it as your job on this Forum to refute that with your lone-man unzip theory [which doesn't comport with what I know of the evidence nor of physics] - rather than let others have their views on what happened. And, you don't get Deep Politics, nor the interconnections between the various aspects of it - the various operations and power configurations/entities that have made it up and make it up still, as well as their motives, repetitive M.O., etc.
Its the 'WTC Collapse Innocence Project'
More paranoid rubbish...
I wrote a detailed explanation and no I did not advance a single alternate theory which I was at AE911T anyone who thinks they have evidence that I did... needs to present it. They can't and so this is simply BS and a slanderous.
Eccentric? What the hell does that mean?
Maneuvered? I volunteered... Gage INVITED me to the board and I DECLINED HE PERSISTED. I supposed Gage maneuvered himself to the CEO of AE911T and payed himself 80K in salary and another 25K or more in benefits and perks. Pretty effective maneurvering!
I maneuvered myself right out of that cultlike operation... or was I tossed out by paranoid people who thought that the term - engineered distruction- instead of CD would destroy their organization? Hardly matters... AE is a sham and all hat and no cattle. It will collapse like a house of cards one of these days.. IF people wake up and realize they've been sold a bill of goods.
Lemkin, once again you assert/report unsubstantiated BS... which has the only purpose of insult and slander. But coming from you or the other cowards who refuse to surface themselves or any proof it hardly matters. My post named the paranoid... fo back to post #520 and their names are all there. I've forgotten most of them...
Publish or perish.