25-08-2013, 08:35 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:No 'explanation' that works for WTC 1 and 2 could possible work for WTC 7 - proving that any such 'explanation' short of CD is but a desperate gambit to support the unsupportable 'officially and knowingly wrong version'. WTC was constructed totally differently and quite asymmetrically, yet it collapsed in almost the exact same way - again only CD explains this. Add to that the nanothermite chips and residue; the excess energy output; the explosions seen and heard; the planes hitting 1 and 2 exactly at the same floors that had undergone retrofitting of the fire-insulation and other upgrades; those with pre-knowledge of the event; the molten steel in the basement of all three towers for months...and on and on [I'm leaving out about 30 other things that lead most without an agenda to support the government to believe controlled demolition occurred]....What I hear from Orling is starting from a desired 'outcome/explanation' and working backwards; rather than working with the evidence, as it stands, and trying to work out what happened.
The twins and 7 were different sysems and failed in different places because of where the damage was. 7 failed from TTF failures on floors 5,6&7.... twins by collapsing mass driving down and then the core collapsing from Euler forces.
Gravity works pulling mass straight down... and considering the mass distribution of those buildings one would expect them to come straight down and organized but not *symmetrical* ... there was no symmetry in the collapse.
Heat was the straw that broke the camel's back and led to all three collapses.