26-08-2013, 11:45 AM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Tony,But Mister Jeffrey, you can't expect us to just take your word that the core columns fell due to heating and that the columns would have missed each other without some form of scientific rationale for how you came to your conclusions on these matters. The information doesn't need to be your own.
Keep waiting.
I am not providing anything other than the links to work others have done... already provided.
Anyone who chooses to be willfully ignorant will never look and is incapable of seeing anything which undermines their beliefs.
Not my job to change anyone who does not want to change their thinking for any reason.
Good luck with your research...
Quote:re iron mico spheres and Harrit:
"Sunday, December 19, 2010
Dr. Rancourt
Thank you for your interest in our publication, and the effort you have made to formulate the questions as they appear in
http://climateguy.blogspot.com/2010/...-911-cant.html
Our answers follow below. Your questions are highlighted in green. (on this post here they are italics)
Yours sincerely
Niels Harrit
...
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS: Much is made of the fact that Fe-rich spheroids are present after reaction but there is no discussion of the grey-layer or of the origin of the Si-rich spheroids. Heating causes many things and there is an exothermic reaction so the conclusions about the presence of Fe-rich spheroids (which are reported to contain oxygen) as evidence for the thermite reaction is tenuous.
ANSWER: A scientific paper is a set of data and the best hypothesis rationalizing the observations. Fe-rich spheroids are observed after a thermite reaction. Fe-rich spheroids have never been observed unless there was a thermite reaction."
Mister Jeffrey, it doesn't look like Dr. Harrit said there was only one way to form iron microspheres. He actually said "they have never been observed except in a thermite reaction". There is a difference. However, if Dave Thomas did find one iron microsphere in his test (and I didn't see more than one shown in the video) then they have been observed in other ways. This does not explain the finding of iron microspheres in abundance in the WTC dust along with nano-thermite, which actually forms iron microspheres when ignited.
An analogy here would be of a man found with bird shot pellets all throughout his body and a shotgun found nearby and Dave Thomas saying well bird shot pellets are the same size as those from a BB-gun. Does it even make any sense that the man was actually shot with a BB-gun vs. a shotgun with Birdshot?