26-08-2013, 08:55 PM
Lacking is any initiator of the observed multifloor failure and drop.
At 562 Jeffrey responds
The drop and movement were the result of multiple forces and factors... beginning with the mechanical destruction of the columns by the plane impact, the fires which started from the air line fuel, and electrical shorts, office contents inlcuding plastic and other combustible substances, failure of the fire protection.
This is the official explanation of mechanical damage and heat weakening.
Now the explanation is apparently limited to column splices above 98 (above the impacted floors).
Sustained heat of 600 degrees Centigrade not seen. Limited impact below not shown to have removed columns, yet columns absent from observed drop.
Mechanical damage and heat weakening not adequate to support official explanation, nor account for sudden onset and rapid, unimpeded structural failure.
Twelve years of because-we-say-so argument-from-authority to the contrary notwithstanding.
At 562 Jeffrey responds
The drop and movement were the result of multiple forces and factors... beginning with the mechanical destruction of the columns by the plane impact, the fires which started from the air line fuel, and electrical shorts, office contents inlcuding plastic and other combustible substances, failure of the fire protection.
This is the official explanation of mechanical damage and heat weakening.
Now the explanation is apparently limited to column splices above 98 (above the impacted floors).
Sustained heat of 600 degrees Centigrade not seen. Limited impact below not shown to have removed columns, yet columns absent from observed drop.
Mechanical damage and heat weakening not adequate to support official explanation, nor account for sudden onset and rapid, unimpeded structural failure.
Twelve years of because-we-say-so argument-from-authority to the contrary notwithstanding.