27-08-2013, 12:31 PM
[Some Speculation follows and some not at all Speculative]
I accept as fact that another film exists. Similar in perspective but not exactly Zappy's position. Why?
Long before I knew of Greg Burnham or Rich Dellarosa or any other public talk of another films' existence, the film was described to me by another person I know to be honest and of integrity.
A few minor differences are present in the descriptions but in truth I feel that the common features of all viewers known to me render the liklihood that all saw the same film.
1.) Somebody's other film does or did exist.
2.) Because the other film conforms to witness statements and the Ztoon does not, both cannot be reality.
Just who and how the Ztoon was "screwed, blewed and tatooed", is way above my pay-grade.
I have to rely on those that know the methodology of film.
Other than the issue of two films being in existence, I am left to conclude: The bastards spared no effort to lie to me.
When a few frames were released as the grail of the case in '64, I took the presentation at face value. I was only eleven and the Unthinkable was still Unthinkable.
When more data escaped from CD Jackson's memory hole, I was a little older and suspicious.
I revoked my prerogative to accept the US Govt.'s word about anything, the mistrust was well earned.
Alteration is not the issue to me, although important. Equally important is the fact of another film (in my view).
Something is rotten in Zappy-land.
Exactly what is research better done by more experienced people than I.
Any progress made in the spectrum of the Nov. '63 Coup has been the work of the independent researchers,
as opposed to the deceptions of US Govt. over the last half-century.
Researchers punching holes in the lies is crucial, the combined efforts will give truth even to my limited view.
Those traitors did stop SS-100X and wait for the coup d' etat to be accomplished. IMHO.
I prefer a film to depict events as they really did happen, not manufactured history as a time-clock of events to serve the Empire of Traitors.
That is my story and I am sticking to it.
I accept as fact that another film exists. Similar in perspective but not exactly Zappy's position. Why?
Long before I knew of Greg Burnham or Rich Dellarosa or any other public talk of another films' existence, the film was described to me by another person I know to be honest and of integrity.
A few minor differences are present in the descriptions but in truth I feel that the common features of all viewers known to me render the liklihood that all saw the same film.
1.) Somebody's other film does or did exist.
2.) Because the other film conforms to witness statements and the Ztoon does not, both cannot be reality.
Just who and how the Ztoon was "screwed, blewed and tatooed", is way above my pay-grade.
I have to rely on those that know the methodology of film.
Other than the issue of two films being in existence, I am left to conclude: The bastards spared no effort to lie to me.
When a few frames were released as the grail of the case in '64, I took the presentation at face value. I was only eleven and the Unthinkable was still Unthinkable.
When more data escaped from CD Jackson's memory hole, I was a little older and suspicious.
I revoked my prerogative to accept the US Govt.'s word about anything, the mistrust was well earned.
Alteration is not the issue to me, although important. Equally important is the fact of another film (in my view).
Something is rotten in Zappy-land.
Exactly what is research better done by more experienced people than I.
Any progress made in the spectrum of the Nov. '63 Coup has been the work of the independent researchers,
as opposed to the deceptions of US Govt. over the last half-century.
Researchers punching holes in the lies is crucial, the combined efforts will give truth even to my limited view.
Those traitors did stop SS-100X and wait for the coup d' etat to be accomplished. IMHO.
I prefer a film to depict events as they really did happen, not manufactured history as a time-clock of events to serve the Empire of Traitors.
That is my story and I am sticking to it.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON