27-08-2013, 08:40 PM
Jim
Your observation
If the films were not changed the camera originals would have been seen by the public in 1963, not 1975.
resonates with Bertrand Russell's observations
In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?
The elimination of the turn, the removal of the dramatic slowing described by fifty-nine (59), head turns too rapid for humans, et cetera
Two films
Two events at NPIC
And what of Dan Rather's emotional assurance he saw the president's head move forward from a shot from the rear
Award-winning--redundantly credentialed--Dan Rather--would he or our government lie to us?
Garrison's jury waited years; Geraldo and Groden and Gregory were twelve years after the event.
In LIFE the conjunction of CD Jackson and JFK's major publishing enemy (Donald Gibson, Battling Wall Street: The Kennedy Presidency).
In Zapruder a member of the Dallas right-wing and a (former) partner of George DeMohrenschildt's wife.
And DeMohrenschildt vouched for the bogus backyard photos.
A film in the hands of a wing-nut and the constellation of spooks long before it was shown to the little people under the balcony.
The government which took 200 pieces of Oswald evidence to DC and returned a 400-piece assemblage,
which, with Cotton Mather's zealotry, expunged the witness testimony of heresy and planted shells and weapons
and put Spector's star chamber in authority should be swallowed whole
ee cummings' Olaf comes to mind
Your observation
If the films were not changed the camera originals would have been seen by the public in 1963, not 1975.
resonates with Bertrand Russell's observations
In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?
The elimination of the turn, the removal of the dramatic slowing described by fifty-nine (59), head turns too rapid for humans, et cetera
Two films
Two events at NPIC
And what of Dan Rather's emotional assurance he saw the president's head move forward from a shot from the rear
Award-winning--redundantly credentialed--Dan Rather--would he or our government lie to us?
Garrison's jury waited years; Geraldo and Groden and Gregory were twelve years after the event.
In LIFE the conjunction of CD Jackson and JFK's major publishing enemy (Donald Gibson, Battling Wall Street: The Kennedy Presidency).
In Zapruder a member of the Dallas right-wing and a (former) partner of George DeMohrenschildt's wife.
And DeMohrenschildt vouched for the bogus backyard photos.
A film in the hands of a wing-nut and the constellation of spooks long before it was shown to the little people under the balcony.
The government which took 200 pieces of Oswald evidence to DC and returned a 400-piece assemblage,
which, with Cotton Mather's zealotry, expunged the witness testimony of heresy and planted shells and weapons
and put Spector's star chamber in authority should be swallowed whole
ee cummings' Olaf comes to mind