Technical Hurdles Suggest Extensive Z-Film Alteration Highly Unlikely

[Charles Drago]

Umm, David, as I said, there is no Hollywood Group.

What there is is the Wilkinsons.

You just won't come to your senses, will you?

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

group noun, often attributive \ˈgrüp\

1: two or more figures forming a complete unit in a composition
2: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship

and

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/group

group n.

1. An assemblage of persons or objects gathered or located together; an aggregation: a group of dinner guests; a group of buildings near the roa
2. Two or more figures that make up a unit or design, as in sculpture.

Well, I hate to tell everyone, but the highest rating the critics ever got with the public was after Oliver Stone's movie came out. Remember, "back and to the left"? Yep, he said it five times. Maybe Stone was a CIA agent? Or maybe it was Zach Sklar?

Or was it Albert Rossi?

Another cheap shot.

No one -- repeat, NO ONE -- at DPF has made any such suggestion regarding Messrs. Rossi, Stone, and Sklar.

And for the record, no one has done more than I've done to try to convince Albert Rossi to stay on DPF.

You, on the other hand, seem pleased and better served by his exit and the opportunities for I-told-you-so's that it provides.

But perhaps I'm mistaken. Please share with us how you attempted to keep Albert within the DPF fold.

[The Wilkinsons] have one significant technical problem to overcome [in re their back-of-head blackout work]. And I look forward to the end result of that endeavor. But during our talk, it became clear to me that they don't buy the wholesale alterationist concept. And that, in this regard, Horne misrepresented who they were and what they are about.

At last, Jim, a prime example of deep political analysis in progress. Of course it originates with the Wilkinsons.

As I tried to explain to you on two previous occasions:

"Deep political analysis of Z-film alteration arguments suggests that some of the most easily refuted were made to diminish all of the most easily demonstrated."