31-08-2013, 02:39 PM
I think I'm getting the logic of the claim now.
There is no question that Michael Paine called Ruth on 11/22/63 at approximately 1.00pm. It is referred to by themselves a few times in the Warren Commission.
Example: (Michael Paine) "I called her immediately getting back to the lab, so she would be watching and listening and getting clued in to the news, start watching the news." (Vol IX, p. 449)
And as that is the ONLY call listed on the FBI report between those numbers then that must be the call the "informant" is referring to.
This call got (deliberately?) obfuscated by Liebeler when he questioned Michael Paine.
Mr. Liebeler: "Now, there has been a report that on November 23, 1963 there was a telephone call between a man and a woman, between the numbers of your residence and the number of your office, in which the man was reported to have said in words or substance 'we both know who is responsible for the assassination.'
Have you been asked about this before?"
What reason did he have for saying 23rd November? Was that in the "informant" document? Is that document fully available anywhere?
There is no question that Michael Paine called Ruth on 11/22/63 at approximately 1.00pm. It is referred to by themselves a few times in the Warren Commission.
Example: (Michael Paine) "I called her immediately getting back to the lab, so she would be watching and listening and getting clued in to the news, start watching the news." (Vol IX, p. 449)
And as that is the ONLY call listed on the FBI report between those numbers then that must be the call the "informant" is referring to.
This call got (deliberately?) obfuscated by Liebeler when he questioned Michael Paine.
Mr. Liebeler: "Now, there has been a report that on November 23, 1963 there was a telephone call between a man and a woman, between the numbers of your residence and the number of your office, in which the man was reported to have said in words or substance 'we both know who is responsible for the assassination.'
Have you been asked about this before?"
What reason did he have for saying 23rd November? Was that in the "informant" document? Is that document fully available anywhere?