Obama's Cairo speech

[Peter Lemkin]

Interesting post on the speech from Washington's Blog' too:

Obama Admits US Involvement in Iran Coup in 1953, But Doesn't Admit American Involvement in False Flags

Obama has admitted that the U.S. was involved in the Iranian coup in 1953.
I applaud the president for admitting this fact.

When will the U.S. admit that the U.S. was not only "involved", but - as documented by the New York Times - Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see also this essay)?
And when will America admit that - as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence - that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security."
And when will we admit that - as confirmed by recently declassified documents - in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings?

Because the important admission is not that the U.S. helped with a coup, but that America and virtually all other powerful nations throughout history have used "false flag terror" as means to political ends.

The Iran admission was unique - no other President or Cabinet level person has ever admitted as much - and it was done as a false-flag op [along with minor participation by the British and some Iranians]. The speech was, I hear, vetted by many to most Agencies of Govt. Hard to believe the CIA signed-off on it...but maybe. Anyway, for this kind of admission that could be viewed by many on the right and 'behind the curtain' as sufficient to terminate the Presidency with extreme predjudice when the proper moment arrives..... His speech while flawed, did break some new ground. He used the word occupation for Israel pver the Palastinians and a half-hearted and half-way mention of the settlements. His quoting of the Koran has already confirmed the ultra-Right's worst fears and the New York Post said he was appeasing terrorists with his speech. Hardly. Wouldn't it be a suprise if he harbored a plan for change in office - as JFK went through. I would predict the same outcome, sadly. On far too many issues of great import and on too many choices of those he has surround him, he seems firmly in the grip of the Deep Political Establishment. One can only hope he awakens....but I doubt it.